Already Dozens of Reports of Vote Fraud and Discrepancy in NH

Many people are scratching their heads over the results of Tuesday's New Hampshire Presidential primary election. In an unprecedented turn of events, both pre-election polls and exit polls were dead wrong in their modeling of the outcome of the election.

While pundits have searched for answers as to why this should happen -- and pollsters and and media stand in a firing circle blaming each other -- a quiet storm of investigative results is beginning to see a pattern emerging in the discrepancies.

Simply put, WE WUZ ROBBED!

The first organization to bring this increasing evidence to my attention was one of my favorite liberal news and opinion blogs, OpEdNews.com. Chief editorial honcho Rob Kall rallied his editorial troops and at this writing has published no less than a DOZEN stories outlining specific voter fraud, apparent or potential ballot-counting "mistakes" and a number of other irregularities.

Over at the Election Defense Alliance, some very specific charges are being leveled. Some of these show that there are huge, statistically significant discrepancies between the election results in districts using optical scan ballots (where Hillary Clinton held a 53%-47% margin) and hand-counted paper ballots (where Obama held an identical lead, 53%-47%) when votes for only those two candidates are counted.

This is a huge story that the corpstream media will likely ignore, that the Democratic and Republican parties are ignoring, and that has staggering implications for the so-called Tsunami Tuesday elections in a couple dozen states on Feb. 5.

You owe it to yourself to become informed on this vital topic and, more importantly, to act on what you learn. Don't take my word for it. Check out the sources, starting with the ones I've linked to above.